Homepage > Students’ Motivation > Database of Publications > Publication's Form
PUBLICATION INFORMATION
Comments about this Publication
Date: 2013.02.07
Posted by Miroslav Prokša (Slovakia)
Message: This publication deals with a report about difficulties in teaching chemistry at Greek schools which are very similar to Slovak ones. The methodic used was the same as ours – it was a questionnaire research. In this case among students of Greek high schools and about their approach towards teaching chemistry. The questionnaire consisted of questions about difficulties of the subject, its importance, about usefulness of chemistry in their future career and etc. Results showed that the most students consider chemistry as something important for understanding of the world but not so useful for their future occupation. Students participating in the research were from variously focused schools – from humanities to technicals. Though gender differences were interesting because girls consider chemistry as less difficult subject than boys but also as a less important for their professional life. Other results are very similar to results taken at Slovak schools, eg.insufficient amount of lessons of chemistry in curriculum, methodics of teaching based mainly on lecturing, insufficient smount of laboratory exercises but mainly these are a key to motivation, a small application of mathematics when teaching chemistry and etc. The research showed also that students dedicated to chemistry have much bigger motivation.
Date: 2012.12.13
Posted by Inforef (Belgium)
Message: The students’ difficulties that are menioned in the publication are the same as those observed in Belgium: use of symbols and concepts, difficulties in mathematics... It describes the teaching of chemistry in Greece, pointing out the centralised curriculum and the lack of practical work in laboratory. The publication provides tests to assess students’attitudes based on various parameters (students’ courses of study, gender). The study developed a questionnaire which is specific to chemistry (since most of them address science in general). It emerges that students’ attitude towards chemistry is not negative (rather neutral) but there is a paradox: while they consider chemistry as important in everyday life, they don’t see it as a career prospect. Most studies conclude that boys are more interested in science than girls. No experience to improve the teaching of chemistry is mentioned, although the survey could of course be used to improve it.
Date: 2012.10.03
Posted by Anna Pitto (Italy)
Message: This paper presents methods and results of a survey conducted among high school students in Greece on attitudes towards chemistry. In particular, a questionnaire was given to students: it contained statements about the difficulty of the subject, its importance, the underlying for chemistry and its usefulness for a future career.
The data are the mean scores for the assessment of the difficulty of chemistry and its interest (neutral attitude) and chemistry is considered by the most of students important to understand the world, but not very useful for a future profession.
The data were also examined by gender and field of study attended (students of science-medicine, humanities, engineering).
Gender differences: the only thing that has a small but interesting difference is the assessment of difficulty: the girls here seem to consider the chemistry less difficult than their male counterparts (honestly I could not understand the interpretation of this difference given by the authors ).
Fields of study: students who are following a course more substantial evaluate the chemistry not only more interesting, important and useful, but also more difficult than the other students who are less familiar with the matter.
An attempt was also to find out whether there is a correlation between students' attitudes and their actual success in the field: shows a positive correlation, but not very high, slightly higher than the other items is the correlation between success and perceived difficulty.
The work seemed interesting, though (I realized later) it is not recent (2004), and data were collected in 2001.
They cite the lack of importance of chemistry in the curriculum (one to two hours per week) and basically theoretical approach, based mainly on lectures, no laboratory work. The importance of laboratory for motivation and interest in my opinion is crucial.
Based in part on earlier studies the article cites as a source of difficulty two aspects:
a - application and use of concepts studied is necessary a continuous transfer from the macroscopic to the microscopic level and the symbolic level, it is not easy for students
b - the application of mathematical tools to the problems of chemical
I agree.
National Reports on successful experiences to promote lifelong learning for chemistry The national reports on chemistry successful experiences to promote lifelong learning for chemistry are now available on the related section of the project portal. The reports presents examples of successful experiences in the partner countries and the results of testing of ICT resources with science teachers.
.